Closed nadalin closed 5 years ago
Ok, will update to JWS.
@msporny Will wait to see PR
PR #652 is in, please review, @nadalin. We will close the issue once you review.
WG resolution on 28 May 2019 call:
RESOLUTION: Issue #609 is addressed via PR #652, which makes a non-normative clarification to the specification regarding JWS. Issue #609 should be closed after the 7 day review period and after the PR is merged.
@msporny See my comments in #652 as they apply here
Your comment was about interoperability, which is already tracked via issue #632. Closing.
" At the time of publication, Working Group members had implemented verifiable credentials using at least three proof mechanisms: JSON Web Tokens [JWT], Linked Data Signatures [LD-SIGNATURES], and Camenisch-Lysyanskaya Zero-Knowledge Proofs [CL-SIGNATURES]"
Please note that JWT is not a proof mechanism since JWTs don't have to be signed, the pointer should be to JWS for a proof mechanism