Open TallTed opened 3 months ago
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/blob/3f3585f8ca3162e019890531b5d73058a3f8727e/index.html#L1475
The second if is unnecessary. Even better, replace the later if the with its.
if
if the
its
To be explicit, change — If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and if the value is not a — to — If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and its value is not a
If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and if the value is not a
If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and its value is not a
There seem to be dueling PRs for this. It was changed earlier today, but now it doesn't appear appears to have been (or was un-changed) un-changed.
If there are different opinions about this phrasing, I would like to get them hammered out, and a final PR made.
Also note the parallel line, which must be synced with the above —
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs-test-suite/blob/46e767307e12482bea5ada24d2f0d16e73bd011f/tests/suites/verify.js#L139C1-L140C1
interesting, some of @Wind4Greg changes were also regressed https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/pull/179
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/blob/3f3585f8ca3162e019890531b5d73058a3f8727e/index.html#L1475
The second
if
is unnecessary. Even better, replace the laterif the
withits
.To be explicit, change —
If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and if the value is not a
— to —If |proofConfig|.|created| is set and its value is not a
There seem to be dueling PRs for this. It was changed earlier today, but now it
doesn't appearappears to have been(or was un-changed)un-changed.If there are different opinions about this phrasing, I would like to get them hammered out, and a final PR made.