Closed seabass-labrax closed 10 months ago
To be quite honest, we use this invalid JSON in neither vc-di-eddsa nor vc-di-ecdsa currently. Maybe we should just delete the paragraph entirely, and add something based on what we end up using closer to publication (if any invalid JSON at all).
we use this invalid JSON in neither vc-di-eddsa nor vc-di-ecdsa currently
OH! Yes, we should only include the paragraph about invalid JSON in docs where we have such invalid JSON.
Editorial, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.
This commit contains a minor improvement to a paragraph early in the specification. See also https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/pull/59.
Preview | Diff