Closed David-Chadwick closed 6 months ago
Neither is correct. The final specification should contain the union of both examples i.e. it should contain the example VC along with the five SD-JWT tabs.
@iherman is there a build error?
@iherman is there a build error?
I do not see any.
You can see the github actions at: https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/actions and these do not refer to any error. Both the editor's draft and the official W3C versions are dated 1st of January '24.
I cannot comment on the original discrepancies.
(B.t.w., if there is an error, it is visible on that list; clicking on the erroneous entry reveals the reasons which may reveal the reason of a fail. It is usually, but not always, a publication validation error thrown by respec.)
The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-01-09
Sounds like, from the call notes, this is a problem with rendering the examples and can be handled after CR. Labeling as such.
related to https://github.com/w3c/respec-vc/issues/9
I dont think this should be labelled Post-CR but rather pre-CR. The reason is that the text talks about securing VCs with SD-JWT, and uses the sd-jwt media type. Thus the published CR should have an example of the securing mechanism that it specifies.
agreed and this is related to @iherman's comment here, I will mark this as pre-cr.
Closing, as this has been fixed with https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/237
A follow-up to add examples for JOSE without SD-JWT is open here https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/issues/240
The latest versions of the draft specification, published on 21 December 2023, are inconsistent. Specifically the latest published version at https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-jose-cose/ contains Example 1 that does not have any encodings (it only contains the example VC), whereas the latest editor's draft at https://w3c.github.io/vc-jose-cose/ contains Example 1 with Committed Issued Disclosed Presented and Verified tabs