Inconsistent sectioning?

[iherman]

The current sectioning is as follows:

• §3 Securing the VC Data Model
  • § 3.1 With JOSE
  • § 3.2 With COSE
  • $ 3.3 JOSE Header Parameter and JWT claims
• § 4. COSE Header Parameters and CWT claims

Shoudn't be either

• § 4 should be in fact § 3.4; or
• § 3.3. should be §4 (and the rest of the main sections shift accordingly; or
• there should be a separate § 4 with a title along the lines of "Header Parameters" with a subsection for JOSE and COSE respectively ;
• like before, but as a subsection to § 3

I am not a domain expert, so I cannot choose which solution is the best.

[brentzundel]

@decentralgabe @selfissued I propose the following options for restructuring:

• §3 Securing the VC Data Model
  • § 3.1 With JOSE
  • § 3.2 With COSE
• §4 Header Parameters
  • §4.1 JOSE Header Parameter and JWT claims
  • §4.2 COSE Header Parameters and CWT claims

or

• §3 Securing the VC Data Model
  • § 3.1 With JOSE
    • §3.1.1 JOSE Header Parameter and JWT claims
  • § 3.2 With COSE
    • §3.2.1 COSE Header Parameters and CWT claims

Let me know your preference and I will raise a PR.

[TallTed]

@brentzundel — I think the latter suggestion is better.

[decentralgabe]

agree on the latter

[selfissued]

The latter also works for me.

[brentzundel]

I will raise a PR to make the changes, but plan to wait until #231 is merged as I expect conflicts if both are pursued simultaneously.

[iherman]

Looking at the latest version of the spec (08 March 2024), this Issue has been completed and is not relevant any more. Closing.