The use cases should speak to "amending" a verifiable credential... specifically, how this might be different from "disputing" a credential, and how an amendment might be added by the original issuer (using VCs), a different issuer (using VCs), or timelines extended via digital signatures (using embedded or external proofs).
The use cases should speak to "amending" a verifiable credential... specifically, how this might be different from "disputing" a credential, and how an amendment might be added by the original issuer (using VCs), a different issuer (using VCs), or timelines extended via digital signatures (using embedded or external proofs).
This issue came out of a discussion here (note the WG discussion on the topic): https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases/issues/124