search

w3c / vc-wg-charter

Developing a new charter for the VC WG.
https://w3c.github.io/vc-wg-charter/
Other
3 stars 12 forks source link

Checking the liaison statements #125

Closed iherman closed 1 month ago

iherman commented 1 month ago

Two changes:

Preview | Diff

iherman commented 1 month ago

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-09-26

View the transcript #### 1.1. Checking the liaison statements (pr vc-wg-charter#125) _See github pull request [vc-wg-charter#125](https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter/pull/125)._ **Ivan Herman:** one PR which I already made that includes the changes on liaisons, the comment came because we did not change a particular statement from the old charter, we did not check to make sure it was still valid. … two notable things, one was that the RCH WG has finished its work and is in maintenance mode, we don't expect to do anything with them, no need to list as liaison, the PR removes that one. … also there was an incorrect URL. … for the other liaison statement, I would like feedback from the group, liaisons for other WGs are not controversial, liaisons outside the WG I personally cannot judge if they are valid or not. … the external organizations here, tell me if there is one or two you would prefer to remove. … or tell me it is good as is and to move on. … Brent and I looked at it, the only thing that at that point we we unsure of was whether hyperledger Aries was still active. … unsure if that liaison is still worth having. **Manu Sporny:** AFAIK the Canadian gvt, which uses VCs, is heavily invested in hyperledger Aries, the acapy implementation for VCs is associated (maybe) with aries. **Ivan Herman:** leave as is, then. … are there any other switches the group would like. … once. … twice. … please put up the other pull request.