search

w3c / vc-wg-charter

Developing a new charter for the VC WG.
https://w3c.github.io/vc-wg-charter/
Other
3 stars 12 forks source link

Removed the reference to an HTTP spec from the "Other deliverables" list #126

Closed iherman closed 1 month ago

iherman commented 1 month ago

The CCG document in referred to (VC-API) is very normative like, and the CCG might consider it as the subject of a new WG. If published as a WG Note, the Rec-track evolution becomes also impossible.

Preview | Diff

iherman commented 1 month ago

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-09-26

View the transcript #### 1.2. Removed the reference to an HTTP spec from the "Other deliverables" list (pr vc-wg-charter#126) _See github pull request [vc-wg-charter#126](https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter/pull/126)._ **Ivan Herman:** this one refers specifically to the reference to a CCG document on HTTP API for digital credentials, it was said that this document is normative looking, either it should be listed as a deliverable/rec track document or be removed. … we have discussed this separately, it turned out the CCG intends to potentially submit that document to either this WG or a later incarnation as a rec track document, which for me means that it must be removed from the charter as is right away. … in the last change of W3C process, it's no longer a real thing to create a WG note which then is turned into a rec track document later, for some reason that is now frowned upon. … counterproductive to have this doc as a deliverable/WG note. … should immediately remove this. … also would satisfy commenter. … any pros/cons? **Manu Sporny:** +1 to remove it, the intention is to take it rec track, cannot publish as note. **Ivan Herman:** I will merge this PR.