Closed brentzundel closed 2 years ago
@mnot, what would be the best way to say "We would like to work with the 'Security People' at IETF when it comes to reviewing, or suggesting who should review, the normative output for this W3C Working Group?".
This is what's in the charter right now under the Liasons section (I added the liaisons after speaking with you months ago about what to do):
Internet Engineering Task Force Security Area Directorate To coordinate broad horizontal reviews on the output of the Working Group among the security working groups at IETF. Internet Engineering Task Force Crypto Forum Research Group To perform broad horizontal reviews on the output of the Working Group and to ensure that new pairing-based and post-quantum cryptographic algorithms and parameters can be integrated into the Data Integrity ecosystem.
@samuelweiler wanted us to replace the SAD with the SAAG. @selfissued is saying don't list the liaison relationship at all.
Help, please.
Perhaps it's best to say something a bit more fuzzy, like:
Internet Engineering Task Force The Working Group will seek security review from the IETF, coordinated through the Liaison
@selfissued @msporny @samuelweiler I have revised the PR according to the suggestions from @mnot, please review
@samuelweiler, this PR (and the linked issue) is an answer to your comment; are you o.k. with this, so that we can merge this PR and close the corresponding issue?
Merging this PR in accordance with our current working mode. If further changes are desired, we can track those in the related issue #52
fixes #52 Signed-off-by: Brent Zundel brent.zundel@gmail.com
Preview | Diff