search

w3c / vc-wg-charter

Developing a new charter for the VC WG.
https://w3c.github.io/vc-wg-charter/
Other
3 stars 12 forks source link

The WG may produce registries #98

Closed brentzundel closed 2 years ago

brentzundel commented 2 years ago

This PR takes one part of PR #85 which I hope will achieve consensus.

Preview | Diff

brentzundel commented 2 years ago

I've also added text which addresses Issue #67

brentzundel commented 2 years ago

@msporny since the original intent of this PR was to try and find consensus on the WG having any registries, I have removed the controversial change and will reintroduce it in another PR

iherman commented 2 years ago

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2022-03-09

View the transcript #### 1.2. The WG may produce registries (pr vc-wg-charter#98) _See github pull request [vc-wg-charter#98](https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter/pull/98)._ **Brent Zundel:** looks like we have rough agreement, we want registries in the charter for the most part. … can you throw your approval instead of the stale CR, any opposition to merging this PR. > *Joe Andrieu:* I oppose, for reasons stated. **Brent Zundel:** Joe your opposition is noted, and will go into the comments on the PR. **Oliver Terbu:** does registries include data integrity proof registry, my concern is it should be permissive enough, and if we can get that right then I'm on board. > *Manu Sporny:* +1 to registry not being restrictive... it needs to be permissive.. **Brent Zundel:** the charter doesn't restrict as of yet but the vcwg may restrict at a later date. … over the noted objection from joe will merge the PR. … two other PRs that build towards what 85 was aiming for, looking at 99 next..