w3c / voiceinteraction

publications of the W3C Voice Interaction Community Group
https://www.w3.org/community/voiceinteraction/
Other
15 stars 5 forks source link

audience #2

Closed dadahl closed 3 years ago

dadahl commented 3 years ago

from Jim Larson's email: Who is the audience of this document?

resolution: add a sentence in the introduction about the audience. (see minutes March 10) https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-voiceinteraction/2021Mar/0003.html

jcstine commented 3 years ago

My apologies: I am unsure as to which file I should submit a pull request. The desire of this issue is to suggest that the proposed architecture has multiple prospective audiences -- not only developers, but enterprises seeking guidance as to architectures of interoperability and optimum flexibility, consultancies wishing to offer clients a "best-practices" checklist of capabilities, and entrepreneurs seeking an "open" architecture upon which a capabilities-services practice could be built. This paper will also serve as a reference point for analysts and commentators who will be seeking to referee the looming tug of war as to the definition of voice assistant/conversational agent interoperability.

dadahl commented 3 years ago

Hi Jon,

Good question – the right file is our main Architecture 1.1 document at https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/blob/master/voice%20interaction%20drafts/paArchitecture-1-1.htm.

Your insights look like great additions to the document.

Best regards,

Debbie

From: Jon Stine @.> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:25 PM To: w3c/voiceinteraction @.> Cc: Deborah Dahl @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [w3c/voiceinteraction] audience (#2)

My apologies: I am unsure as to which file I should submit a pull request. The desire of this issue is to suggest that the proposed architecture has multiple prospective audiences -- not only developers, but enterprises seeking guidance as to architectures of interoperability and optimum flexibility, consultancies wishing to offer clients a "best-practices" checklist of capabilities, and entrepreneurs seeking an "open" architecture upon which a capabilities-services practice could be built. This paper will also serve as a reference point for analysts and commentators who will be seeking to referee the looming tug of war as to the definition of voice assistant/conversational agent interoperability.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/voiceinteraction/issues/2#issuecomment-843573937 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKUTJK23FX4X7RFVAXX3MTTOLLK7ANCNFSM42Q4CTXA . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAKUTJOAI3RRWQGPUVTQEGDTOLLK7A5CNFSM42Q4CTXKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOGJD6VMI.gif

dadahl commented 3 years ago

Completed with Jon's update to the audience section.