w3c / vsso

The Vehicle Signal Ontology (VSSo) based on COVESA VSS and making use of the SOSA/SSN modeling patterns
Other
15 stars 12 forks source link

Align creation tools with Vehicle Signal Specification #3

Open danielwilms opened 4 years ago

danielwilms commented 4 years ago

The tools are now a fork from the Vehicle Signal Specification (VSS), the VSS Tools respectively. We should align it ASAP.

The question is, how we want to continue VSS and VSSo. Two suggestions:

  1. ttl generator could be part of vss-tools for the time being, given that there is a coupling between VSS and VSSo in the foreseeable future.
  2. ttl generator is based on the vss-tools repository, but lives here in a separate repository and we treat VSSo as a true fork, which lives on it's own.

I'd prefer the first option. Any opinion @rtroncy, @klotzbenjamin, @tguild?

klotzbenjamin commented 4 years ago

The idea so far was to draw the line between VSSo and extensions:

I would go with the second option, but keep version aligned with future VSS and VSS tool releases.

danielwilms commented 4 years ago

I would go with the second option, but keep version aligned with future VSS and VSS tool releases.

That sounds like a lot of work to keep the two in line thinking just from version to version, as there's a lot happening right now. The instances for example would make your tooling quite a lot easier. Maybe it would make sense to put it under the maintenance of the tools themselves, as they are then considered as well with every change, which is happening.

rtroncy commented 4 years ago

I would indeed investigate how to implement the first approach and think in putting the ttl generator as part of the vss-tools. I may have good developer resources to assign to this in December to experiment with.

danielwilms commented 2 years ago

Tools now available in vss-tools.

Open issue: Align to core ontology

felix-loesch commented 2 years ago

We have a proposal for the alignment of vss-tools (vspec2ttl) that we can contribute but I think we should wait until we have agreed on the vss-core ontology.

danielwilms commented 2 years ago

I think we can adapt the tooling, with the discussions we have.

Otherwise I'd add now the changes to the current tooling, so that we can move forward with the docs generation for vsso which might result into double work.

would be great, if you could create a PR to the vss-tools repo. otherwise I'll patch it now and you guys have to merge in your features later.

felix-loesch commented 2 years ago

I will create a PR as soon as possible.