Closed shawna-slh closed 6 years ago
Didn’t we agree to not put draft stuff on the new site?? This adds a lot of last-minute complexity.
I was assuming that we'd have the draft revised business case on the beta site -- but maybe others were not thinking that?? I'm happy to discuss -- especially ways to avoid complexity.
Maybe best to just leave bcase section empty for beta?
I don’t have strong feelings. I have added the functionality for drafts. Either we use the currently published one or the new one. We just have to decide :-D
Proposal: For now, the beta has one bcase page. It says:
Accessibility Business Case
The Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) is significantly revising this resource.
The previously published version is "Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization" at https://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/
(The unapproved, in-progress draft revision is here https://w3c.github.io/wai-bcase/business-case/ )
Let me know if you strongly disagree or want us to get more input.
Let me know if you want me to do anything to get content on that page, or anything else.
(And let's see if Sharron and EOWG can get the revised business case publishable before launch...)
Let me know if you strongly disagree or want us to get more input.
As I said, I have no strong feelings.
Let me know if you want me to do anything to get content on that page, or anything else.
I can add it.
@slhenry Shall I now mark it as draft, or not?
@yatil , I think we want a "Draft" treatment like we've done for "Archive", with:
Before announcing beta, let's put that on the in-progress bcase pages.