Open hidde opened 5 years ago
cc @slhenry (if you agree I'm happy to do the work)
Hi Hidde. It is good to have your input. There is a lot of EOWG background behind these titles. We would need to get up-to-speed on what went into the decisions to use those titles. And then re-open it with EOWG. I have several thoughts, but cannot prioritize spending time on it right now. Please put this on hold, and we'll see if we can get to it with other work later. Thanks!
thanks for the reply, I had suspected there would be some context to this… On hold it is!
Also, the titles can be shorter when I finalize the implementation of resource titles: https://github.com/w3c/wai-website/issues/157 (hopefully next week)
Nice, thanks for the link @yatil
Briefly, a few of the points:
Similar jobs have different titles, especially around the world. Also, in a small organization, one person might do multiple roles. For these and other reasons, EOWG preferred to focus on the task rather than the role for these and some other resources. From Quick Start Guides/Requirements Analysis:
"Note: At the EO meeting of 1st May 2015 it was agreed to use an activity or task based approach rather than a role based approach, for example Designing instead of Designers."
These are 3 of 6+ planned "Tips for Getting Started with Accessibility". Some of the others are different. (Not sure if and when we'll get to the others.)
tips and possibly even also getting started are implied
(because web, accessibility, … are implied
For readers who are familiar with the WAI website or look around and figure that out, yes. However, some people might land on this page without any context. Also, good to have those words in title for SEO Also, title will be used out of context, including:
There is a line break on the H1s:
Tips for Getting Started Writing for Web Accessibility
and we'll still continue to work on improvements! :-)
I found these titles quite long:
and the second “for” made me read twice.
What about:
(because web, accessibility, tips and possibly even also getting started are implied?)