w3c / wai-website

This repository hosts the WAI Website.
https://www.w3.org/WAI/
Other
60 stars 315 forks source link

[New Tip] Design tip no1 - Providing sufficient contrast #745

Open dboudreau opened 8 years ago

dboudreau commented 8 years ago

Reference: http://w3c.github.io/wai-quick-start/designing.html#provide-sufficient-contrast-between-foreground-and-background

The description of this quick tip ends with a sentence that says: "Contrast ratio is a short version of the more technically correct term luminance contrast ratio". Having taken part in the "Easy Checks" discussions a few years ago, I understand where that last sentence about luminance is coming from, but this is way too subtle for anyone who's new to accessibility. In order to remain true to our goal of addressing readers in layman's terms, I suggest we remove the last sentence entirely. I don't think it brings any real value to someone who would be new to accessibility.

sharronrush commented 8 years ago

+1 On Aug 30, 2016 8:26 AM, "Denis Boudreau" notifications@github.com wrote:

Reference: http://w3c.github.io/wai-quick-start/designing.html# provide-sufficient-contrast-between-foreground-and-background

The description of this quick tip ends with a sentence that says: "Contrast ratio is a short version of the more technically correct term luminance contrast ratio". Having taken part in the "Easy Checks" discussions a few years ago, I understand where that last sentence about luminance is coming from, but this is way too subtle for anyone who's new to accessibility. In order to remain true to our goal of addressing readers in layman's terms, I suggest we remove the last sentence entirely. I don't think it brings any real value to someone who would be new to accessibility.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/wai-website/issues/745, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGqv0098PcPdiqrwLk28Ir3Ow1uz6Xe7ks5qlC-BgaJpZM4Jwhd2 .

AndrewArch commented 8 years ago

+1 from me too

nitedog commented 8 years ago

-1 from me - in the past we've been heavily criticized for using technically imprecise terminology, and I fear leaving out this clarification may come back to bite us.

Maybe present this sentence somehow differently instead?