search

w3c / wcag

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/
Other
1.14k stars 256 forks source link

Amend definition of motion animation to *not* exclude blurring #4040

Open patrickhlauke opened 3 months ago

patrickhlauke commented 3 months ago

Closes #3949

Preview | Diff

netlify[bot] commented 3 months ago

Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name Link
Latest commit abe30f61d84b65a09c0aaea1399a4e9175a00d60
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wcag2/deploys/670004a909c7a20008346824
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4040--wcag2.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

bruce-usab commented 3 months ago

Discussed on TF call. IMHO this is a nice minimal edit for the issue raised.

detlevhfischer commented 2 months ago

This is a bit odd in that the blurring from the PR title is nowhere mentioned in the amended text (opacity and color change is). As to blurring, one could also argue that transitions from sharp to strong blur to sharp and back to sharp etc. could be quite distracting if not just an initial effect, the more so the large the image is. Admittedly haven't seen that out there yet.

patrickhlauke commented 2 months ago

This is a bit odd in that the blurring from the PR title is nowhere mentioned in the amended text (opacity and color change is)

before, the list of excluded effects included blurring. this PR removes the mention of blurring, so does what the PR title says?

detlevhfischer commented 2 months ago

@patrickhlauke argh... not sure how I could misread this.

mraccess77 commented 2 months ago

My two cents - blurred images give me a headache and I am not able to look at them. This is a big issue with blurred remote meeting backgrounds but also some styles of photography.

patrickhlauke commented 2 months ago

My two cents - blurred images give me a headache and I am not able to look at them. This is a big issue with blurred remote meeting backgrounds but also some styles of photography.

@mraccess77 while that is a wider, more general topic, this proposed change here should be welcome for you then because it does now mean that where blurring is used on interaction, it can now fail Animation from Interactions (while before it seemed to imply that blurring was exempt, just like changes in colour and opacity)

bruce-usab commented 2 months ago

Discussed on backlog call 9/6.

bruce-usab commented 1 month ago

Discussed on backlog call 10/4. Added "to the viewer" at end of sentence to address concern raised by @cookiecrook.