Closed devarshipant closed 6 years ago
Thank you for the comment. Can you suggest improved language for the first bullet? When I review it, it seems that a positive restatement of this first bullet is what the 2nd and 3rd bullets do. Perhaps we should just remove the first bullet?
What do you think of combining the first and second bullets to something like:
A mechanism to bypass repetitive blocks of content allows screen reader and keyboard only users who visit several pages on the same site to reach content with fewer keystrokes.
The three bullets are: -When this Success Criterion is not satisfied, it may be difficult for people with some disabilities to reach the main content of a Web page quickly and easily.
Your suggestion makes the combined bullet overlap with the original 3rd bullet. What to do with that one?
Can we replace the first 3 bullets with the revised combined bullet?
Thanks, Devarshi
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < notifications@github.com> wrote:
The three bullets are: -When this Success Criterion is not satisfied, it may be difficult for people with some disabilities to reach the main content of a Web page quickly and easily.
- Screen reader users who visit several pages on the same site can avoid having to hear all heading graphics and dozens of navigation links on every page before the main content is spoken.
- People who use only the keyboard or a keyboard interface can reach content with fewer keystrokes. Otherwise, they might have to make dozens of keystrokes before reaching a link in the main content area. This can take a long time and may cause severe physical pain for some users.
Your suggestion makes the combined bullet overlap with the original 3rd bullet. What to do with that one?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/939#issuecomment-392100144, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHCQkPsZnftmydyN-zeEclbZgrH9Scnwks5t2Cd-gaJpZM4UK6f4 .
This issue was moved to w3c/wcag#404
First bullet under Benefits does not sound like a Benefit on satisfying this criterion:
Compare it to second bullet, where it's usage is more appropriate.