Closed daniel-montalvo closed 3 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 118c3602b1e921566081614b83cd945a973fc08e |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/wcag2ict/deploys/667c4ff7c8a145000802a7d9 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-400--wcag2ict.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
since there is a new one under development -- I think this general link that will take you to the latest might be a better "evergreen" link
https://www.etsi.org/standards#page=1&search=EN%20301%20549
it is slow to load but it will give you latest version at whatever point in time you click on it.
Just realized, the EN link was updated (must have been on a different PR) and shows in the built document. @GreggVan I think references need to be to a specific version - @daniel-montalvo correct me if I'm wrong on that.
@GreggVan @maryjom this is not something we manage directly here.
Relevan update happened at tobie/specref#790
Our document will pull any updates that the ETSI people want to make to spec ref
I think the best place to discuss how specref should handle ETSI documents is https://github.com/tobie/specref
@maryjom
If you are a normative document and you want to cite another normative standard normatively, then you need to state the specific standard and date you are referring to. (you can't cite something normatively that might change).
But for informative references to another document or effort -- people are generally interested in seeing the latest version. And, since they are dated, they can also check to see which version was in effect when your paper or note or whatever was released.
in this case -- you are talking about how this (WCAG2ICT) document might be used. it clearly won't be used for an already existing EN 301 549 -- but rather for a future one (like the one under development now).