Vocabulary references rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource

gkellogg commented 8 years ago

In particular renderedVia. Also, PreferContainedDescriptions and PreferContainedIRIs have the wrong rdf:type.

gkellogg commented 8 years ago

I'm wondering why this is outstanding for so long? It seems easy to fix:

PreferContainedDescriptions has type oa:rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource. See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/index.ttl#L168.
PreferContainedIRIs has type oa:rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource. See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/index.ttl#L173
renderedVia has range rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource. See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/vocab/wd/ontology/index.ttl#L364.

BigBlueHat commented 8 years ago

Not sure why this one's gotten missed. I'm marking it as editor_action which should more clearly add it to @azaroth42's list. :wink:

Thanks for staying on it!

azaroth42 commented 8 years ago

Apologies for the ridiculously long delays... day job and all that. Fixed the instances, and took the range out of renderedVia, as it doesn't say anything.

gkellogg commented 8 years ago

Thanks Rob, I'll update gems and the test results.

w3c / web-annotation

Vocabulary references rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource #326