Example describing window.opener is garbled.

[jyasskin]

Example 5 says:

That is, if the new window can access the non-secure context via window.opener, and the non-secure context can access the secure context by grabbing a reference to the window, then it , because it is a new top-level browsing context delivered over an authenticated and encrypted channel.

The bold part is garbled.

[mikewest]

Yup. I think I meant to remove that example entirely as it's redundant with the test in example 4. Thanks for the heads up!