Closed mikewest closed 6 years ago
@titanous noted https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/40, which won't have any normative effect, but is an important editorial change to make before CR.
@jakearchibald filed https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/42, which requests normative change to the noopener
bits of the spec.
@w3ctag suggests linking to their "Securing the Web" finding: https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/web-https
This either has follow-ups or is done.
I think we're ready to transition to CR. Perhaps you share that belief?
https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-secure-contexts/CR.html is up for your review.
+1s and emojified responses welcome here. Alternatively, if you think something's not ready yet, file an issue and I'll link it up here.
CfC posted to the list at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2016Jul/0032.html.
Discussion of references to WHATWG docs at https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/9.