Closed emlun closed 1 month ago
If you don't like how it's phrased, perhaps:
Verify that the UP bit of the
flags
in authData is set oroptions.
mediation
is set toconditional
.
Of course "or" in natural language does not often mean what it does in logic (i.e., it can often mean mutual exclusivity), so you could phrase it like:
Verify that the UP bit of the
flags
in authData is set; if not, verifyoptions.
mediation
is set toconditional
.
TBH, I think the original text makes more sense.
I will take @pascoej's :+1: reaction and @timcappalli's comment in https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2126#discussion_r1735148989 as approval reviews; merging. Thanks!
Fixes #2122.
I'm not entirely convinced about the "ignore this" part being a completely separated sentence, but I chose to formulate it this way to emphasize that by default the
UP
flag should be verified, and only in exceptional circumstances should this verification be ignored.Preview | Diff