Open timcappalli opened 2 hours ago
Are you sure a language map is appropriate for this? My first impression was rather that authenticatorDisplayName
is a single-language localizable text field - it's a user-configurable value that should only ever be presented back to the same user.
After the discussion at TPAC I've come around to agreeing that a language map may be a good choice. The ability to specify multiple languages may be most useful if a value is pre-populated by the authenticator vendor without necessarily knowing the user's preferred locale; if the user overwrites with their own configuration the map can simply be collapsed to containing a single key.
The language map type is a superset of what can be expressed by the single-language localizable text field, so the language map is the safer choice for forward compatibility.
Related to #1644
Proposed Change
authenticatorDisplayName is currently a DOMString and does not support localization, specifically language codes and direction.
Change to a map following the String Meta spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/string-meta/#language-maps