search

w3c / webcomponents-cg

Web Components community group
https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/
187 stars 13 forks source link

Declarative Web Component Proposal Demos - March 2024 #84

Closed Westbrook closed 3 months ago

Westbrook commented 4 months ago

@trusktr has gotten everyone started with gathering proposals for demonstration when we gather back for March breakout via https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents-cg/issues/80. Here we'll work on scheduling for one or more sessions of this.

If you'd like to participate, please use this link to share your availability between March 11th and March 22nd for this session. It would be great to have a consensus meeting time by March 4th at the latest.

Beyond the list of demos being gathered above, be sure to check out the notes from February's breakout on the same topic available here.

Westbrook commented 3 months ago

Meeting info for Demo Day no. 1

WCCG: DEC Demo Day Monday, March 18 · 1:00 – 2:00pm Time zone: America/New_York Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/jsk-ruew-sea

See you there.

We've got a lot of demos coming together, so we're gonna need a second session, please share your availability here for scheduling.

Westbrook commented 3 months ago

Demo Day no. 1 is a wrap!

If you missed the meeting, you can read the meeting notes to catch up.

Discussions Let's keep the discussion going, each of the presented demos can be discussed directly, below:

Be sure to share your availability for the next round of demos here!

Meeting chat hidden within... You 1:02 PM https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jOz2Mu8y49j81WPE7__sHkyoUQey6X09JNiYmEh4b1I/edit#heading=h.z14o87sh4gji Steve Orvell 1:10 PM How is that better than just authoring the class? Justin Fagnani 1:11 PM how do you do imports, etc Steve Orvell 1:12 PM I like the attempt to add as little as possible to make something satisfying. Michael Warren 1:13 PM i think i'm with justin and steve and just one script with the class in it is the easiest? you can do imports and callbacks like normal etc Justin Fagnani 1:13 PM I think it'd be more minimal to define a class though - you wouldn't need all these lifecycle attributes Steve Orvell 1:13 PM Without declarative tempating, it's pretty unsatisfying imo. moon 1:13 PM I like the lifecycle method attributes. Justin Fagnani 1:14 PM and it'd be a normal module. The attributes seem to imply that there's a generated class behind the scenes and that the scripts aren't executes immediately like all other script tags Michael Warren 1:14 PM how would public component methods be defined? like MyDCEModal.show() Michael Warren 1:16 PM if its just one script and the class, then thats basically HTML modules as we've been discussing right? Brian Kardell 1:17 PM that was my question Brian Kardell 1:18 PM well, you would want to not throw Michael Warren 1:18 PM if you did two definitions, how would you do two Githubissues.
  • Githubissues is a development platform for aggregating issues.