Open scripthunter7 opened 5 months ago
Another approach to solve this would be to keep browser.storage.local
as is while making one or both of the following APIs work reliably in incognito/private mode (related issue #534).
Extensions can already save data while in incognito/private mode through browser.local.storage
so I don't see how it helps to prevent them to do so reliably through the above API.
Personally just being able to reliably use the CacheStorage API regardless of incognito/private mode would be welcome.
I am reaching out to propose an enhancement to the
browser.storage.local
functionality. As it stands, this storage currently only supports values that are serializable to JSON.However, in some scenarios, the ability to store binary data directly can greatly enhance efficiency and performance.
To address this, I recommend integrating support for binary data formats such as
Uint8Array
,ArrayBuffer
, orBlob
without the need for JSON serialization. Certainly, maintaining backward compatibility is crucial, since a lot of existing code relies on the currentstorage.local
API.