Closed dontcallmedom closed 6 months ago
There are WebIDL validation steps failing, can you take a look @dontcallmedom ?
I did - I think they're bogus (since this PR doesn't touch the document at all), but in any case, I can spend more time on them once there is approval at least with the principles and the data :)
Ack, @jan-ivar to take a closer look, but free free to merge if he is happy about doing so
PTAL @jan-ivar :)
If the tool requires to put a test status in the amendment, we might need a 'to-be-added-shortly' state, as implementation might not be yet available.
This is a first pass at associating amendments to the relevant test cases and updates made to WPT as part of the amendment documenting process.
I have not documented associated test updates for the following PRs: #2758 #2759 #2794 #2797 #2801 #2847 #2853 #2861 - most likely because no updates were brought, but it could be that I missed them too.
It would be useful if someone could review that the annotations made in
amendments.json
are correct. Namely that:Merging this PR will also require that any new amendment documents its test status (either as "already-tested", "not-testable", or as an array of pointers to WPT pull requests).
Preview | Diff