Closed egekorkan closed 1 year ago
We should involve @ektrah for CoAP.
During April 3rd Binding Templates teleconference (see minutes here), the following arguments were made.
Discussion in main call 2020.04.08
In the call of 17.04, we have decided to change the coap vocabulary to include the methodName as well as methodCode but keep using the methodName in the TDs. For the MQTT vocabulary, we will create the vocabulary to be used in the TDs and not model all the features of MQTT.
Thanks to @vcharpenay
the first inits files are available here https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/tree/master/ontology
@ashimura here is some redirection to set up on w3.org, as discussed in today's TD meeting:
with header Accept: text/turtle
:
otherwise:
This issue will only track the MQTT RDF that is in works at #156
The CoAP RDF is already tracked at https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/97
Call of of 02.11, the group has agreed to close
Currently, we cannot reference to the CoAP and MQTT vocabulary from the context like it is possible for HTTP. @sebastiankb mentioned that we should contact the community of these protocols to get help but we might also want to start a bit, at least describing the basic features we are using. I would start by looking at the HTTP in RDF. @vcharpenay would you have other suggestions?