Closed hgfischer closed 9 years ago
I'm also confused a bit about the terminology and what is expected of this project. Is this going to be a full-fledged WoT server, or is it supposed to be a package and demo implementation?
On 27 Jun 2015, at 18:07, Herbert Fischer notifications@github.com wrote:
A common practice of Go projects is not to define frameworks, but packages (or libraries). Are we using the wrong terminology here? Maybe we just need a well defined package, and a well defined demo server using this package.
Right, the Go implementation of the Web of Things framework is a Go package (or packages). We need a clean separation between the protocol independent functionality and the code to support individual protocols and data encodings.
— Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org mailto:dsr@w3.org>
On 27 Jun 2015, at 18:43, Herbert Fischer notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm also confused a bit about the terminology and what is expected of this project. Is this going to be a full-fledged WoT server, or is it supposed to be a package and demo implementation?
My aim is an evolutionary progression from a simple demo into a fully fledged server. A long journey begins will a single step ...
— Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org mailto:dsr@w3.org>
Thanks @draggett
A common practice of Go projects is not to define frameworks, but packages (or libraries). Are we using the wrong terminology here? Maybe we just need a well defined package, and a well defined demo server using this package.