Closed JKRhb closed 9 months ago
Note that the link format was updated to use an automatic feature of ReSpec to look up the section number and name. I like that - let's make them all like that, and I will do the same thing for Security etc.
I think this PR could now be ready for an initial review. I honestly had some difficulties with this task because the use-case descriptions had a lot of variation and, in some cases, it was a bit unclear if a use-case actually covered a requirement.
I think the creation (or rather: reapplying) of a uniform format for the use-case descriptions would be nice to make tasks like this one and comparison across use-cases a bit easier. Some use case descriptions were also partially outdated and might need to be updated at some point to reflect the changes that were added to the WoT specifications in the meantime.
I think a review of this PR could be conducted in two steps:
To make this PR easier to review, we could also consider splitting it into smaller chunks – let me know if you think this could make sense here.
I have, to the best of my ability, reviewed the changes and additions in the clause that describes discovery requirements and the use cases to which they are linked. It appears that only with a few exceptions, all use cases need all requirements. Let me know if there's anything more to be done from my side. Thank you for all your efforts on this important project!
Will resolve #236.
Depends on #241.
Preview | Diff