Open JKRhb opened 9 months ago
@farshidtz: Do you also think this gap has been closed? Or are there still gaps to fill in the API specification?
Yes. Thank you for updating the use case.
@chachamimm we are not working on the document anymore but I think we can simply merge this PR as it updates some editorial stuff and removes an outdated statement about missing Discovery API.
While working on #242, I noticed that there is a leftover sentence in the document that states that there is no standard API specification for WoT TDDs "to maintain and query TDs". As there is an API specification included in the Discovery document by now, I think this sentence could be removed now which this PR proposes to do.
@farshidtz: Do you also think this gap has been closed? Or are there still gaps to fill in the API specification?
Preview | Diff