search

w3c / wot-usecases

Repository of the WoT IG to discuss possible WoT use cases
https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/
21 stars 34 forks source link

[Process] Not proceeding to feature definition if there is no gap #258

Open egekorkan opened 7 months ago

egekorkan commented 7 months ago

Mentioned in https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/Process.md at Gap Analysis by "The purpose of this phase is checking if the extracted requirements are already defined by some existing standard(s)", it is not clear whether we should proceed to feature definition if there is no gap. Thus, I propose to add a check there to not move to a feature definition step if there is no gap and indicate this in the submitted use case.

Please comment if you don't agree. Otherwise, I will make a PR.

chachamimm commented 7 months ago

I think we need to clarify what "Gap Analysis" is.