Each model table contains, at the beginning, a line for the type relationship and then a specification of the Class. With reference to RDF that made sense in the WA model, but this document (while referring to the WA document) does not refer to RDF at all. In this respect, the second line of these tables, and the concept of a "Class", seems to be superfluous, and makes things look more complicated than they are.
I propose to remove those lines overall, and remove the concept of a Class. The first line of each table already specifies what the value of type must be.
iherman
commented
6 years ago
Each model table contains, at the beginning, a line for the
typerelationship and then a specification of theClass. With reference to RDF that made sense in the WA model, but this document (while referring to the WA document) does not refer to RDF at all. In this respect, the second line of these tables, and the concept of a "Class", seems to be superfluous, and makes things look more complicated than they are.I propose to remove those lines overall, and remove the concept of a Class. The first line of each table already specifies what the value of
typemust be.