Final specification for the accessibility terms?

[iherman]

I am trying to pick up the separate thread from #293 how these should be defined in our draft. Is it so that:

• accessibilitySummary is a localizable text
  • the current specification in the draft and the WebIDL are fine
• all the other terms, except for accessModeSufficient, are a (possible) array of strings, each strings are allowed to take a value specified for that term. That means that the
  • the draft should be changed in the table specifying 'one or more texts'...
  • the current WebIDL (sequence<DOMString>) is fine
• accessModeSufficient is:
  • one or more texts, each a comma-separated list of values, each value being one of the predefined values
  • the WebIDL should be: sequence<sequence<DOMString>>

Knowing that this does not correspond to the schema.org documentation, but that is being taken care of in a separate discussion outside of this WG.

Is this a correct interpretation?

@mattgarrish @avneeshsingh @HadrienGardeur

[iherman]

I have prepared a version with these definitions: https://github.com/w3c/wpub/tree/accessibility-terms-update

@mattgarrish if that does reflect what is meant, you can merge this into the master; I will be off soon...

[HadrienGardeur]

I'll need to spend more time on accessModeSufficient, right now this isn't handled correctly yet in our JSON Schema.

[avneeshsingh]

@iherman, conceptually your approach is fine. AccessibilitySummary is description, a string of text, AccessModeSufficient is lists of lists, and all other properties (AccessibilityFeatures, AccessibilityAPI etc. consist of a list of values.

[iherman]

Thanks @avneeshsingh

@HadrienGardeur is it o.k. if we update the draft along these lines?