Closed iherman closed 6 years ago
Based on the discussion on #312 this PR does what we have decided. However, we may want to wait a bit to see if the changes in the JSON schema are fine or not (@HadrienGardeur). Then again, if there is an issue, that can be taken care of later...
@HadrienGardeur thanks, I missed this one. I have changed that, too.
Merging and closing now.
Removed the
@
sign from the JSON-LD keywords@id
,@type
,@language
, and@value
, as agreed on a call for #312. (Not closing that issue, because there is still editorial work do to related to that issue. This meanttype
term is now both a json schema keyword and a term in the data. I hope json schema can cope with that)I have also
rel='canonical'
.Fix #324
Preview | Diff