Open astearns opened 4 years ago
Thanks for finding a good link. Can you, perhaps, provide a short summary of the WG's current opinion so people reading the explainer don't have to wade through that whole issue?
@snyderp is working on a summary, so I would defer to him. My understanding is that we think a list-based solution should work (which would need some research and iteration to not break things for minority scripts), and that there will need to be an opt-in in browser prefs to allow local font access when it's appropriate.
@astearns thats for the ping. Here is a summary and alternate proposal I expect will solve the use cases w/ less machinery and "freeze the web" risk than the other discussed options.
https://github.com/w3cping/font-anti-fingerprinting/pull/6
It would be very good to have CSSWG discussion on this repo too!
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4497 seems more appropriate than "No signals"