w3ctag / design-reviews

W3C specs and API reviews
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
332 stars 56 forks source link

TAG review of Web Audio API (round two) #212

Closed svgeesus closed 6 years ago

svgeesus commented 7 years ago

Dear Sirs and Madam of TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

Further details (optional):

You should also know that...

The previous TAG review of this specification is still relevant; please let us know if we failed to address any point in that review. Domenic continued to provide guidance on issues raised from that earlier review. So this is a request for a second round of review to cover more recent developments and ensure we got everything right from the first round.

The major change since that earlier review is the extensibility point. We switched from ScriptProcessorNode (running on the main thread, now deprecated) to Audio worklets which are of course derived from the TAG/CSS Houdini Worklet. Plus a lot of detailed spec improvements and clarifications. Complete changes list.

Tests are being ported into WPT from the Mozilla and Chrome tests; this only started a couple of weeks ago but will fill up in the coming weeks.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):


Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting

For background, some decent explainers:

https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/blob/master/explainer.md https://github.com/zkoch/paymentrequest/blob/gh-pages/docs/explainer.md https://github.com/WICG/IntersectionObserver/blob/gh-pages/explainer.md (although this one includes IDL, which an explainer should not)

dbaron commented 6 years ago

WebAudio/web-audio-api#1471 was raised as worth discussing

torgo commented 6 years ago

@slightlyoff to leave some feedback on their WebAudio/web-audio-api#1471.

torgo commented 6 years ago

We discussed with chairs at london f2f. We are happy with current state of things. Thanks for flying TAG.