Delta review (to CR) of WebXR Augmented Reality Module

[himorin]

Wotcher TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of WebXR Augmented Reality Module.

The WebXR Augmented Reality Module extends the WebXR Device API to expose the ability to create a basic augmented reality (AR) session.

• Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr-ar-module/blob/master/ar-module-explainer.md
• Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/webxr-ar-module-1/
• Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/webxr/ar-module
• User research: N/A
• Security and Privacy self-review²: https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr-ar-module/issues/85 (initial phase)
• GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr-ar-module
• Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
  • Manish Goregaokar, @Manishearth, Google, Editor
  • Brandon Jones, @toji, Google, Editor
  • Rik Cabanier, @cabanier, Meta
  • Ada Rose Cannon, @AdaRoseCannon, Apple, Chair
  • Chris Wilson, @cwilso, Google, Chair
  • Ayşegül Yönet, @Yonet , Microsoft
• Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Immersive Web WG
• Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: N/A
• External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
  • Chrome Status: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5450241148977152

Further details:

• [x] I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: delta review request for CR transition (no solid date)
• The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: Immersive Web WG
• The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue):
• Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A
• This work is being funded by: N/A

You should also know that...

• Last TAG review was #462 (2020/Jan), right after FPWD
• Please see changes from FPWD

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback

[torgo]

Hi @himorin - We reviewed this week and we don't think any of the chanegs represent any architectural changes from the previous positive review. Privacy considerations looks great. Thanks!