Closed michael-n-cooper closed 1 year ago
Hi @michael-n-cooper thanks for this! We are just setting this up for discussion in our virtual face-to-face. Can you please send an explainer to give us a little more context on this review?
Hi @torgo WCAG 2.2 doesn't have a formal explainer, it's been continuing the old WCAG 2.x work. Explanatory material is in an Overview and the Understanding WCAG 2.2 materials. This horizontal review is focused on changes since the previous CR.
Thanks @michael-n-cooper that's really helpful.
Hi @michael-n-cooper - thanks again for bringing this to our attention as part of wide review. We've reviewed and we're happy to see this go forward. Can you clarify regarding the parsing issue (4.1.1) - just for our benefit so we understand why AT is no longer parsing HTML? Are you confident that there aren't any remaining edge cases where that would still be needed?
@michael-n-cooper as discussed in today's TAG call, we're happy to close this as satisfied - thanks again for sending this our way. If you can let us know some more detail on the issue I asked about above that would be great. Thanks for flying TAG.
Name of your specification
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
URL of your specification
https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/CRD-WCAG22-20230125/
When does the review need to be finished?
2023-02-24
What has changed since any previous review?
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#substantive-changes-since-the-6-september-2022-candidate-recommendation
Please point to the results of your own self-review
No response
Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/
Pointer to any explainer for the spec
No response
Other comments
No response