w3ctag / design-reviews

W3C specs and API reviews
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
322 stars 55 forks source link

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 2023-01-30 > 2023-02-24 #811

Closed michael-n-cooper closed 1 year ago

michael-n-cooper commented 1 year ago

Name of your specification

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2

URL of your specification

https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/CRD-WCAG22-20230125/

When does the review need to be finished?

2023-02-24

What has changed since any previous review?

https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#substantive-changes-since-the-6-september-2022-candidate-recommendation

Please point to the results of your own self-review

No response

Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/

Pointer to any explainer for the spec

No response

Other comments

No response

torgo commented 1 year ago

Hi @michael-n-cooper thanks for this! We are just setting this up for discussion in our virtual face-to-face. Can you please send an explainer to give us a little more context on this review?

michael-n-cooper commented 1 year ago

Hi @torgo WCAG 2.2 doesn't have a formal explainer, it's been continuing the old WCAG 2.x work. Explanatory material is in an Overview and the Understanding WCAG 2.2 materials. This horizontal review is focused on changes since the previous CR.

torgo commented 1 year ago

Thanks @michael-n-cooper that's really helpful.

torgo commented 1 year ago

Hi @michael-n-cooper - thanks again for bringing this to our attention as part of wide review. We've reviewed and we're happy to see this go forward. Can you clarify regarding the parsing issue (4.1.1) - just for our benefit so we understand why AT is no longer parsing HTML? Are you confident that there aren't any remaining edge cases where that would still be needed?

torgo commented 1 year ago

@michael-n-cooper as discussed in today's TAG call, we're happy to close this as satisfied - thanks again for sending this our way. If you can let us know some more detail on the issue I asked about above that would be great. Thanks for flying TAG.