Open InaOana opened 1 year ago
@AlistairStewart, @FatemeShirazi, I have tackled the reviewers' comments found in the first 3 items above and would appreciate any feedback you have. My updates have been marked/added as red text to this folder. The 4th item needs more time and I will not tackle it this week. Thank you.
Sec 3.3: Motivation/intuition for the formalization of the properties perfect completeness, soundness, and unforgeability is missing. Why do these capture what should be achieved?
p. 7: forgecomkey game: pk \neq pk \land bit_i =0: should \land be \lor? Seems like the implication (pk=pk) -> bit_i=0 is desired here?
p. 9: "while the R_ba^incl relation is defined using" -> should it be "pa" here?
p. 9, 11: No intuition/motivation is provided for the stated polynomial identities.
p. 12: "If this holds": should it be "if this doesn't hold"?
Typos ...
[x] incorporated reviewer's 606B feedback
[x] incorporated reviewer's 606C feedback