For ad-hoc csv files, read.myacc.csv() returns the header arranged in rows, but g.inspectfile() was trying to access header rows as if they were columns, like this: header$sample_rate. I modified the code to correctly access the sample rate as a row of the header object.
In addition, g.inspectfile() was trying to process a header returned by read.myacc.csv() the same way it processes an Actigraph cvs header, which caused this module to crash, because a header returned by read.myacc.csv() has a different format.
Also removed the checks for rmc.bitrate and rmc.dynamic_range to be numeric -- both of these can be character strings if these values are to be read from the header.
Plus some minor cleanup.
Checklist before merging:
[X] Existing tests still work (check by running the test suite, e.g. from RStudio).
[X] Added tests (if you added functionality) or fixed existing test (if you fixed a bug).
[ ] Updated or expanded the documentation.
[X] Updated release notes in inst/NEWS.Rd with a user-readable summary. Please, include references to relevant issues or PR discussions.
[ ] Added your name to the contributors lists in the DESCRIPTION file, if you think you made a significant contribution.
Fixes #1056
For ad-hoc csv files, read.myacc.csv() returns the header arranged in rows, but g.inspectfile() was trying to access header rows as if they were columns, like this:
header$sample_rate. I modified the code to correctly access the sample rate as a row of the header object.In addition, g.inspectfile() was trying to process a header returned by read.myacc.csv() the same way it processes an Actigraph cvs header, which caused this module to crash, because a header returned by read.myacc.csv() has a different format.
Also removed the checks for rmc.bitrate and rmc.dynamic_range to be numeric -- both of these can be character strings if these values are to be read from the header.
Plus some minor cleanup.
Checklist before merging:
inst/NEWS.Rdwith a user-readable summary. Please, include references to relevant issues or PR discussions.DESCRIPTIONfile, if you think you made a significant contribution.