Somehow a lot of poor descriptions of changes slipped through the peer-review process. For example in 3.0-1 it states "Part 2: Added option to provide a csv file with start and end dates when accelerometer is expected to be worn #943" This is not informative, we need to refer to specific parameters and not force reader to find a specific issue. The reference to the issue is only to help trace back additional details.
Somehow a lot of poor descriptions of changes slipped through the peer-review process. For example in 3.0-1 it states "Part 2: Added option to provide a csv file with start and end dates when accelerometer is expected to be worn #943" This is not informative, we need to refer to specific parameters and not force reader to find a specific issue. The reference to the issue is only to help trace back additional details.