Open lgeistlinger opened 7 months ago
This is a real outlier study that we created to represent the "typical, healthy" microbiomes of various body sites, and it has a lot of large signatures. If accommodating it may compromise performance of the rest of the wiki, we could split it into multiple studies or something.
Looks like 1. has resolved on its own, and 2. was actually an artifact from inspecting the file in Excel. I don't see such a malformed line when opening the file in vim or reading into R line by line.
It sounds like this issue has been resolved and can be closed?
Yes this can be closed
Although I do see the error at the bottom of the page again, so we might wanna check whether we want to do something about it. This issue is separate from the new zenodo release which is not affected by this issue.
It probably depends on how loaded the server is when the page is requested. We'll check on how we can fix this.
We're going to defer the loading of all the hierarchy information in the tooltip that is displayed on hover until the hover is actually performed. This should cut down on server load and fix timeout issues. The downside is that sometimes it may take a bit of time to load the information depending on the cache status. We think this is a worthwhile tradeoff. We'll experiment and let you know how it goes.
Relatedly, experiment 10 on study 562 shows no signatures at all but I see an extremely long signature when I go to: https://bugsigdb.org/Study_562/Experiment_10/Signature_1
This is perhaps a bit more troubling because there isn't even an error message that something should be there but isn't.
Just confirming that Study 562/Experiment 10/Signature 1 does not exist in the CSV exports or in any named version (devel, Zenodo) that I have checked.
We're going to bump priority on this
Two issues with https://bugsigdb.org/Study_562:
signatures.csv
export from https://bugsigdb.org/Help:Export is malformatted in L626