Closed drighelli closed 1 year ago
For the SCoPE2 dataset, low-quality cells were already removed by the authors. For the proteomics data, low-quality cells were defined based on the median coefficient of variation for the proteins in each cell (using negative control samples to set the threshold). For the scRNA-Seq, low-quality cells were defined as cells with less than $10^4$ UMIs.
So, in my opinion, cell QC is not required for the SCoPE2 dataset.
Thanks @cvanderaa !!
Hi @drighelli - sorry for the delay! I've checked the G&T papers and it seems QC filtering on the cells is already applied at both the genome sequencing as well as the transcriptome sequencing step.
"For quality control, we calculate the median absolute pairwise difference (MAPD) of the genome-wide logR values per single cell. The higher the MAPD value, the higher the overall noise in the DNA copy-number data. We discarded single cells having a MAPD score higher than 0.6 or 2 when the cell’s DNA was amplified with PicoPLEX or MDA, respectively"
"On the basis of the number of uniquely mapped reads and the above distributions, we filter the single-cell transcriptome data based on the number of mapped reads and the number of genes expressed above a set threshold. We applied a threshold of at least 3,500 genes with a TPM value ≥ 1; i.e., single cells demonstrating fewer than 3,500 genes expressed at a TPM value ≥ 1 were excluded from further analyses"
thanks @lgeistlinger !
We infer for the seqFISH dataset that quality control have been made during the preprocessing of the dataset by the authors of the hackathon paper. They declare to proprocessed the data for aligning the cell types across the seqFISH and the scRNAseq datasets.
For the CITEseq/ECCITEseq I have followed the section 12 of the Advanced OSCA book, where they suggest a cell quality control based on ADTs and mitochondrial genes.
For Multiome data the preprocessing was made with Signac
We are going to include quality control of cells inside each dataset, I'm tagging all of you for having a few feedbacks before running quality checks by myself, thanks to everyone!