Closed luzhang321 closed 2 years ago
Very sorry for the delay here - @paolinomanghi will you be able to resolve this for the Bioconductor 3.14 release?
Thanks for your work on this table. It is normal to have more samples updated on NCBI then actually analised in the paper. The table I used to map the files against the raw reads was https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?linkname=bioproject_sra_all&from_uid=392180.
Hi :)
SmitsSA_2017 data has 40 samples recorded(sample information matched with ena (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJNA392180?show=reads). Data is from the paper: Seasonal cycling in the gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. In their supp.table1 ( filtered metagenomic = yes ), only 35 samples are recorded. In all,
TZ_HADZA_3132 MALE TZ_HADZA_177 MALE TZ_HADZA_3187 MALE
[1] "TZ_HADZA_3202" "TZ_HADZA_3134" "TZ_HADZA_3104" "TZ_HADZA_102" "TZ_HADZA_174" "TZ_HADZA_883" "TZ_HADZA_245" "TZ_HADZA_243"
Looking forward to your reply and thank you!