Open mikelty opened 3 years ago
I dont really know why they say it is 43, for real. I could get until n < 8logn. Can someone explain it please? Here is my math:
I dont really know why they say it is 43, for real. I could get until n < 8logn. Can someone explain it please? Here is my math:
Hi @jrmatos, did you ever figure out how to arrive at the solution given? Thanks.
wolfram says it's more like 2 to 26 though.
The input you gave is not lg, instead it is the natural logarithm. In the book, lg is equal to log2 https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=8n%5E2%3D64n%28logn%2Flog2%29 approximately between 1.1 to 43.5. Since the the question doesn't specify a half input is valid, you round it down to the floor ( rounding it up causes 8n2 to be greater than 64nlog2n )
I dont really know why they say it is 43, for real. I could get until n < 8logn. Can someone explain it please? Here is my math:
You'd have to use the Lambart W function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function) I think.
This made me realise that I'm going into this far too early. I haven't even completed my IGCSE, and my algebra foundation isn't nearly the level that it is meant to be. Considering how this book is meant for students studying in college/uni, or those who have done mathematics to an extent, it likely assumes the reader already has some set level of ability in mathematics.
wolfram says it's more like 2 to 26 though.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8n%5E2%3D64nlnn