This is a use case that doesn't make much sense to me, so I'm not sure that this is a high priority bug. I'm not sure which of these implementations is actually favorable: A gap is mostly property of the horizontal axis: It's a break in time. It doesn't really make much sense for a gap to slide with phase.
The fact that a gap ignores phase seems correct.
However, a time skip at the same spot in each wave lane but at different spots in time is exactly what I wanted to convey. The way wavedrom does it is exactly what I wanted, but I've never seen a continuation that wasn't all the way down a timing diagram.
I eventually abandoned the idea of using a gap to communicate this timeskip, as the ellipsis does just fine.
wavedrom handles gap placement differently than wavedrompy:
wavedrom:
wavedrompy:
This is a use case that doesn't make much sense to me, so I'm not sure that this is a high priority bug. I'm not sure which of these implementations is actually favorable: A gap is mostly property of the horizontal axis: It's a break in time. It doesn't really make much sense for a gap to slide with phase. The fact that a gap ignores phase seems correct.
However, a time skip at the same spot in each wave lane but at different spots in time is exactly what I wanted to convey. The way wavedrom does it is exactly what I wanted, but I've never seen a continuation that wasn't all the way down a timing diagram.
I eventually abandoned the idea of using a gap to communicate this timeskip, as the ellipsis does just fine.