Open wamps-jp opened 11 months ago
Thank you for your input. We chose the word "include" as we wanted to show that it was non-exhaustive. In addition, in the UG we stated that any command that modifies the data can be undone
and redone
, and since importing data falls under this, we believe that this should not be considered a documentation bug as it is already clear to the user.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: The phrasing "include" is vague. The purpose of the UG is to have clarity for the user, and having to make an assumption about the interaction of undo
with import
places the onus on the user to know how your app works, when the responsibility lies on the creators.
As seen in the UG, the list of commands
redo
(andundo
, not pictured) can interact with is made clear. However, during my testing, I found thatundo
andredo
can also revert changes made by importing a different json file. I believe making it clear thatundo
andredo
can also affectimport
is important, since it may affect users' experience.