Closed egillax closed 6 years ago
That sounds strange, if you put the data on dropbox I can try it.
2017-09-21 16:53 GMT+02:00 egillax notifications@github.com:
Thank you for the great toolbox!
I'm getting different results for the t-maps outputted by BROCCOLI's RandomiseGroupLevel and fsl randomise where I'm only testing for the groupmean (-groupmean flag in Broccoli and -1 flag in randomise).
The commands I ran were: RandomiseGroupLevel volumes.nii -groupmean randomise -i volumes.nii -o output -1
The maps look the same but the t-values are off by a factor of ~470 for BROCCOLI. So like 0.06 instead of 28. I've also done a 1 sample t-test in spm and the results are very similar to the randomise ones.
I've attached the information about my system from getOpenCLInfo.
I can put the data on dropbox for you if you wan't to try it out yourself. Any idea what could be the problem?
CLI_info.txt https://github.com/wanderine/BROCCOLI/files/1321624/CLI_info.txt
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wanderine/BROCCOLI/issues/39, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEGryJQ-YCDwBgWuYSwB7sqIWctic9q8ks5sknhjgaJpZM4PfcfX .
-- Anders Eklund, PhD
There is something strange in the header. If I do
fslinfo volumes.nii
it says that the data_type is UINT8, but if I look at the dataset in fslview
fslview volumes.nii
the values are actually floats... so if I do
fslmaths volumes.nii volumes_float.nii -odt float
and then run RandomiseGroupLevel the t-scores are much higher
2017-09-21 20:18 GMT+02:00 egillax notifications@github.com:
Here it is:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/80818jjv5n7m81r/volumes.nii?dl=0
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wanderine/BROCCOLI/issues/39#issuecomment-331239561, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEGryIFEmPola7ADp3NAAdKluuH-S4dlks5skqhsgaJpZM4PfcfX .
-- Anders Eklund, PhD
Thanks! That did the trick.
Thank you for the great toolbox!
I'm getting different results for the t-maps outputted by BROCCOLI's RandomiseGroupLevel and fsl randomise where I'm only testing for the groupmean (-groupmean flag in Broccoli and -1 flag in randomise).
The commands I ran were: RandomiseGroupLevel volumes.nii -groupmean randomise -i volumes.nii -o output -1
The maps look the same but the t-values are off by a factor of ~470 for BROCCOLI. So like 0.06 instead of 28. I've also done a 1 sample t-test in spm and the results are very similar to the randomise ones.
I've attached the information about my system from getOpenCLInfo.
I can put the data on dropbox for you if you wan't to try it out yourself. Any idea what could be the problem?
CLI_info.txt