Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I don't see the need that much. Why do you want to know how good the query is?
If you
see the result, you've got it. If you haven't, type more characters. Or is there
something I am not understanding?
Original comment by zataang...@gmail.com
on 4 Oct 2008 at 3:21
Well, I can see how that wouldn't be useful for most people and it really
should get
a very low priority. Also I don't know how many search results QuickGold is
gonna
support. So maybe this scenario is totally fictional. But imagine you search for
something and get (exaggerated) 100 search results and the one you want is
number
100. You don't know that you got 100 results and don't know that your result is
the
last. You can't see your result right away but it could just be number 6 and
under
the keyboard. So you start scrolling and realize your result is not just hidden
under
keyboard and continue scrolling and scrolling... It's like with google when you
search for something and get 1 billion results you may wanna try a better query
before going through all these results ;)
Original comment by mkm...@googlemail.com
on 4 Oct 2008 at 4:26
Has already been added...
Original comment by zataang...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2008 at 9:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mkm...@googlemail.com
on 29 Sep 2008 at 11:46