Open wanghejin opened 9 months ago
Perhaps we could have made it more explicit that the commands work on lists with filters applied, but since the list
command is available to restore the buyers and poses little inconvenience for users, we would be rejecting this bug as it doesn't fit the criteria of a feature flaws (not optimised enough, doesn't fit well, does not solve the stated problem). We designed the sort
command to work with a filtered list as filter
results can possibly return a large number of contacts that are matching, and so we can sort
these contacts in the filtered list so as to identify those contacts from the filter
results that we really want.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: With all due respect and explanation from the dev team, I would like to stick to type.FeatureFlaw
and argue for a severity.Low
in this case.
sorting
, is not listed in the DG under either User Stories
or Use Cases
. Nor is it stated anywhere in the UG.Attached is a screenshot of the UG on bsort
, the feature in my original bug report:
I am not sure what it means by "Elevate your contact list through organisation based on your priorities." It also did not give any scenario that enlightens me with any possible use case.
I admit that I have overlooked this given the tight time constraint in PE and I should have tweaked my bug report to fit better with the real underlying issue. However, I still believe that there is a legit feature flaw for the feature bsort
After I did a filter operation, but found no one. Then I do bsort, nothing shows up. But in fact there are indeed many buyers in the list it's just I didn't use list to restore the list.